A FUnnie look at the loony residents of the Democratic Underground aka DUmmies in particular and the Leftwing Blogosphere in general.
Sunday, January 18, 2015
What Is DUmmie Screen Name of This I-93 Protest Leech Living in Dad's Mansion?
A homework assignment: What is the name of this #BlackLivesMatter leech who was among those who stopped traffic on I-93 in Boston last week? We know his real name is Noah McKinney and that this leech lives in daddy's mansion as you can see in this VIDEO. His dreadlocks plus the fact that he must be as much a Trust Fund Kid as WILLIAM RIVERS PITT means he is a Trustafarian. Note that he can't answer the question from the reporter as to what kind of work he does which means he is a 28 year old bum. Oh, and he is also a veteran of the Occupy Wallstreet Movement which is ironic since his trust fund money is heavily invested in the stock market much like the equally worthless Ted Hall. All these things add up to the fact that he MUST be a DUmmie. So what is the DUmmie screen name of this useless Bostonian?
Your humble correspondent just saw "The Interview" and I have to tell you that the critics are WRONG! It is absolutely HILARIOUS!!! Hardly a minute goes by in this movie when I am not laughing. And a lot of that laughter was uncontrollable bellylaughs!
But...but what about the near unanimous "opinion" of the critics that the movie stinks? Well, the reason so many of them said they hated the movie is that they are afraid to admit the TRUTH that they also laughed like hell while watching it. So why would they not want to publicly admit it? Because it is so politically incorrect that they don't want to admit they enjoyed it. And I don't mean the part about assassinating Kim Jong-Un of iNorth Korea. There was a lot more that was definitely NOT PC about this movie. So un-PC that feminists would probably demand the ouster of any critic who admitted to liking the movie. So is it lewd and crude as has been charged? Absolutely. I wouldn't recommend kids, the easily offended, or the blue-nose pearl clutchers to watch this flick. However, for most of the rest of us it is highly entertaining.
Normally I don't rely on movies that are ONLY lewd and crude because that means they are also BORING. "The Interview," however, ingeniously uses lewd and crude to make some points such as how shallow TV talk show hosts can be. For example when show host Dave Skylark (James Franco) finds out that Matthew McConnaughey might have had sex with a goat, he screams about getting him on his show and "THE GOAT! GET THE GOAT!...I've got some questions for that goat." Crude, lewd? Yes, but also hilarious and, yeah, I can understand why many might be offended by that but I still laughed at that scene.
Another funnie scene involves the show producer Aaron Rapaport (Seth Rogen) trying to have sex with a North Korean military woman. Problem is he has a strip of poison on his hand which will kill anybody he touches so he attempts to take her bra off with just one hand and his teeth.
As to the Kim Jong-Un scenes they are also hilarious but I don't want to give too much away except to say he loves Katie Perry music and insecure because he likes drinking margaritas but his father told him it was gay. Oh, and in one scene Dave Skylark asks him if he "sharded" and Kim defensively denies it but accuses the cameraman of doing it.
No more description of the movie here from me so as not to ruin it for you. Kudos to Seth Rogen for writing this HILARIOUS comedy. Emphasis on COMEDY. The primary motive was to make the audience laugh, not to do a big exposé of North Korea.
So forget all the naysaying critics. I am telling you that "The Interview" is one of the funniest movies in years. Okay, so Kim Jong-Un won't be laughing but most viewers will laugh their asses off.
The lack of self awareness on the part of WILLIAM RIVERS PITT is completely laughable as you can see in his THREAD title about the completely political Senate Intelligence Committee Report, "THEY SHOULD ALL BE IN ****ING PRISON." Hey, you want a report, Pitt? How about this newspaper report from last week titled, Scott Ritter paroled in online sex case. Anyway, speaking of being in "****ING PRISON," how about if we interview the victims of the Newton school yard in order to track down the perp? So let us now watch the clueless Pitt climb up upon his moral high horse while screaming his silly outrage unto all the world in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, wondering when the Temporary SockPuppet begins his prison term:
THEY SHOULD ALL BE IN ****ING PRISON
[Along with Scott Ritter and the Temporary SockPuppet.] But we "knew that already.
[What's with this "we" bit, Kemosabe?] Gotta look forward, don'tcha know.
[What brand of cigarettes does the Temporary SockPuppet prefer? The same kind we took to Scott Ritter on prison visits? Now that Pitt left his cat's territorial mark of moral outrage, let us check out the other DUmmies who never have a bit of complaint about the ISIS headchoppers...] It is infuriating
[You bet. It is infuriating that all these years later the Newton schoolyard perp still walks free.] The fact that they are all walking free. Infuriates me to no end. MAKE THEM PAY!
[Break out that Trust Fund Kid checkbook.] Life without parole in Maximum Security, with the other Hannibal Lechter types.
[Hannibal SockPuppet?] The irony of incarceration in Guantanamo would ever so delicious.
[The irony of Pitt demanding they serve prison time is even more delicious.] These people are monsters. The world cannot allow monsters to go free and live in luxury. It only breeds more monsters.
[Why do you hate Scott Ritter and the Temporary SockPuppet so much?] I'm not sure how to express my anger at my country.
[Why? You do it every day so you have lots of practice.] Thank you for this, Will. I plan to write up an essay to post here on DU:GD this evening. Right now, I'm still too angry. So I'll head out to my pond & sweat lodge to think about all of this for a while.
[How about if you start the essay like this: "It was a dark and stormy night. The Temporary SockPuppet, wearing only a raincoat and nothing underneath, prepared to make a major exposure on the Newton Schoolyard when..."] That is all. Can't improve on that, Will. You said it all!
[And he keeps saying and saying and saying it until that major chip on his shoulder falls off.] Yup RW Conservatives are not merely sociopaths they are mass murderers Prison is too good for them. Where is the outrage at the The International Criminal Court in the Hague?? They must have known some of this!
I doubt US citizens will lead the cry for justice! But as we all know, justice delayed is justice denied...
[What is it? 10, 12, 14 years since the Newton crimes?] Taking into account the standards used at Nuremberg, a good share of the Chimp's administration, including the Chimp himself, should have been hanged for waging aggressive war, crimes against peace, wartime atrocities and crimes against humanity. The gallows should have been busy for weeks.
[Speaking of hanging, the Temporary SockPuppet thought he was hung, a notion laughable to anybody in the know.] I am looking forward . . . to seeing Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and many others do the perp walk.
[Like the one Karl Rove performed 24 business hours ago on May 12, 2006?] Every time I see a war criminal on tv I throw my ****ing shoe at the tv. I'm all out of shoes and tvs.
[You're also all out of any bit of sanity.] ****ing Prison? Aren't those just for sex offenders?
[A good question for either Scott Ritter or the Temporary SockPuppet.]
KOmmie Rage at Rolling Stone Over Debunked Rape Story
The Left, along with the KOmmies, DUmmies, and Nancy Grace figured that at long last they could finally blame white jocks for sexual abuse. Unfortunately for them, the DUke LaCrosse case completely backfired on them bigtime. However, now they figured they had a slam DUnk case against a bunch of white frat boys. After all this time the rape accusations were written up in detail in Rolling Stone. Well, that story did hold up for a couple of weeks, enough time for the idiotic president of the University of Virginia to suspend frat activities without even doing an investigation when this case also blew up in their faces as you can see in this big BACKTRACK from Rolling Stone today. In addition, the Washington Post did the FACT CHECKING that the so-called writer of the Rolling Stoned story should have done and found it came up way short in terms of veracity starting with the fact that the alleged perp wasn't even a member of the frat in question.
So now all those idiots who protested the frat at UVA plus the DUmmies plus the KOmmies now look like complete shmucks yet again. That explains the REAL reason for their rage at Rolling Stoned as you can see in this KOmmie thread, What were the discrepancies in the Rolling Stone UVA rape case story. So let us now watch the KOmmie rage in Bolshevik Red as yet another phony story backfires on them big time while the commentary of your humble correspondent, wondering how long before that frat OWNS Rolling Stoned after the massive lawsuit, is in the [brackets]:
What were the discrepancies in the Rolling Stone UVA rape case story?
[The truth?] Rolling Stone just said that because of discrepancies in their story they no longer trust the rape victim. As the parent of a daughter and a faculty member who has heard a number of similar stories (it can't be mass delusion over twenty years!) I demand to know what those discrepancies are. This is going to have a chilling effect on the report of campus rape. Rolling Stone has a very high obligation to report those discrepancies and explain why they don't trust the story. This is not just a journalism story, this is a societal story - and the first time I have seen movement on the rape culture that allegedly (it could be mass hysteria) and many elite fraternities. Also, what about the author, does she also mistrust her subject now?
[Poor baby! Your blame white privileged frat boys shtick has been taken away from you. As to the author, you might find her face on a milk carton.] I am hoping different sites can put pressure on Rolling Stone to explain themselves. If it really was serious discrepancies there is nothing to do, but it has put back the discussion on sexual violence years maybe. If Rolling Stone was intimidate into doing this there are deeper problems with our traditional media than even I realized.
[Waaaah! My leftwing narrative has been RUINED yet again. Now on to the other grieving KOmmies...] As many others pointed out, this story had problems from the very start.
[Like a lack of fact checking on the parted of the author and Rolling Stoned?] The problem with the story is that the RS writer apparently didn't try to contact any of the accused men.
[That should have been a strong tell right there with any normal person which, of course, doesn't include KOmmies.] Rape survivors who talked to her, her friends, female sexual assault awareness advocates...they say they've been misled by her and don't trust her story. It's baffling to me that anyone even remotely liberal could care so little about the truth
[Not baffling to me.] i'm pretty furious at rolling stone right now.
[Gonna cancel your rolling papers?] I wonder how this is going to play out.
[That you and your fellow leftists will look like total IDIOTS yet again.] These students were tried and convicted on the words of a single girl victim. That's all the evidence we need.
[And that the UVA president needed to whip out the lynch ropes.] The WaPo account is devastating to the narrative
[And to the KOmmie MYTH.] As it currently reads, RS failed to vet the accuser. Besides the humiliation of the retraction (and that's what this is, not an equivocation), RS may be financially liable for enormous damages.
[Soon if you are a rock star and what to get your face on the cover of the Rolling Stoned, you're going to have to clear it with the frat boys first.] Why didnt RS track down the friends who met with her the night of the event? Why didnt they follow up with the fraternity?
[Because it would interfere with the narrative fiction.] Fortunately, RS didn't name the men, so they didn't libel any identifiable persons. But the story did enormous damage to the fraternity and its members. It also did grave damage to UVa.
[I'm seeing damage to that fraternity to the tune of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS!!!] But the entire fraternity system at UVA was suspended, not just the accused house.
[Make that TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS!!!] She just identified the PKP person who raped her at his PKP event...and that person was never a member of PKP
[Oops! Better send some Depends coupons to the story author.] The guy she identified doesn't just deny the rape, he denies that he ever even met her. That should be fairly easy to disprove, e.g., anyone who had seen them together on any occaision. But the WaPo quotes from her friends on campus do not confirm that they met; on the contrary, the friends told the WaPo that the name she gave doesn't fit what she said about the guy previously. One campus advocate is now using the word "misled" to describe her initial conversations with Jackie.
[Yup. That frat will definitely end up OWNING Rolling Stoned.] Rolling Stone just turned off their comments. Almost 200 - vanished. That is not the way to do damage control. Sigh.
[Don't worry. We still have your KOmmie KOmments.] Has UVA ever denied it? They take it seriously so wouldn't they want to scream to the world its a hoax if it is?
[Not the UVA president. She suspended all the frats without proof and now she has egg on her face.] Some people still remember the Duke Lacrosse team case, which was a disaster for the school, the community, the coach (who was fired) and members of the team. The players were eventually vindicated, but it was a nightmare of a witchhunt conducted by the DA who was later disbarred.
[Also conducted by Nancy Grace.] The UVA President punished the entire Greek system based on a sloppy and unverified story in popular culture magazine.
Ferguson: Temporary SockPuppet Laughably Invokes "To Kill A Mockingbird"
The Drunken Bostonian just couldn't resist grandstanding the Ferguson riots. This time WILLIAM RIVERS PITT wants everybody to see how literate he is by quoting from "To Kill A Mockingbird" to imply that the "Gentle Giant" aka Michael Brown was a poor innocent like Tom Robinson in the Harper Lee novel. Here is Pitt's grandstand thread about Ferguson, “Atticus–” said Jem bleakly. One has to wonder if the Temporary SockPuppet read that line from the novel to impress teenyboppers in the Newton schoolyard. Now Pitt is trying to impress his fellow DUmmies with a completely inappropriate quote. So let us now watch WILLIAM RIVERS PITT go wildly off-base with a completely inappropriate quote to impress his fellow DUmmies in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, noting that the Pittster is posting his commentary from the lilly white woods of New Hampshire, is in the [brackets]:
“Atticus–” said Jem bleakly.
["Girly-" said Temporary SockPuppet drunkenly.] He turned in the doorway. “What, son?”
“How could they do it, how could they?”
“I don’t know, but they did it. They’ve done it before and they did it tonight and they’ll do it again and when they do it — seems that only children weep.”
[Speaking of children, Temporary SockPuppet. Let's hope you never do it again.] — "To Kill A Mockingbird," Harper Lee
[Now for the DUmmie reaction to Pitt's pathetic attempt to impress them with an INAPPROPRIATE quote...] And tonight, we are all weeping...
[Guess what DUmmie CaliforniaPeggy, it was the ultra violent "Gentle Giant" who was shot down on the heels of robbing a store, NOT Tom Robinson.] Oh, California Peggy, what's to become of us? So many gains I thought we'd made as a society seem to have gone up in smoke. I feel like the bottom just fell out.
[Perhaps DUmmie tbill could make amends for the ills of the world by adopting the mother of the "Gentle Giant" as a permanent house guest in his home.] Aw, Will. What a great quote on this awful night.
[Michael Brown as Tom Robinson? Will's quote as unintentional humor.] ... I swear, this is what went through my mind since approx 9:30pm EDT last night. The whole affair reminds me of "To Kill A Mockingbird."
[Your reasoning abilities reminds me of "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test."] The more things change the more they don't change at all.
[Wow, Pitt! That is such an original and profound thought. I never heard that before. May I copy it down, laminate it, and place it into my wallet to treasure now and forever, unto the end of time...or until the Newton school bell rings?] Yet again, Will ... nailed it.
[You bet. Will...nailed it. And now he is hiding out in lilly white New Hampshire.]
Even the DUmmies are quite discombobulated by the shocking Jonathan Gruber VIDEO in which he boasts about how the public had to be deceived about Obamacare for it to pass and that the voters were basically stupid. The video was first posted on YouTube on Friday and NewsBusters was the FIRST major website to FEATURE it the following day. It has gone viral on the web but almost predictably ignored by most of the MSM. As to the Web, it is circulating sequite widely but some sites such as KOmmieland still refuses to discuss it. However, the DUmmies have looked at the Gruber video in two threads, Obamacare Architect Jon Gruber Says DECEIVING AMERICANS Necessary to Pass Bill and Obamacare Architect: ‘Lack of Transparency’ Helped Us Pass the Law. As you will see, the Gruber video has opened the floodgates of DUmmie animosity toward ObamaCare. What many now forget is that ORIGINALLY back in 2009 and early 2010 the DUmmies HATED the Senate version of the ObamaCare bill. However, when that version was forced into adoption due to the election of Scott Brown the DUmmies soon changed their tune into one of grudging acceptance. Publicly the pretended to be enthusiastic about ObamaCare but that was only because Conservatives continued to oppose it. However, now with the Gruber revelations, the DUmmies have relapsed back to their original animosity to ObamaCare. So let us now watch the DUmmies blast Gruber and ObamaCare in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, wondering if I mentioned that NewsBusters was the FIRST major website to feature the Gruber video, is in the [brackets]:
Obamacare Architect Jon Gruber Says DECEIVING AMERICANS Necessary to Pass Bill
[Gruber now claims he regrets saying exactly what he thought while being recorded.]
Nothing like the American policy elite showing its true colors.
[Newsflash! Conservatives NEVER believe the Obamacare BS.] This recently-posted video (hat tip Daily Signal) shows Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber matter-of-factly stating that an honestly and simply described Obamacare would not have passed Congress. Preying on “the stupidity of the American voter” was necessary to get the bill passed. Of course, Gruber deems that to be a good thing. And similar well-intentioned policy wonks brought us bank deregulation, which ultimately produced the financial crisis, “free trade,” which is actually managed trade designed around the interests of American multinationals, and our Middle Eastern adventurism, among other things.
Gruber is yet another case study in the Upton Sinclair saying, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends on his not understanding it.” In Gruber’s case, a “transparent” Obamacare bill would have made the enrichment of Big Pharma and the health insurers more visible. The idea of universal healthcare, which also involves the healthy paying for the sick, is popular all over the world. Most people understand that even if they are healthy now, they can in short order be among those needing big ticket health care if they have a too-close encounter with a rapidly moving vehicle. So Gruber’s excuse ins’t just patronizing, it’s dishonest.
[Those quotes were from the leftwing NakedCapitalism website. Now to the DUmmie Peanut Gallery...] He's also the one who said federal subsidies were deliberately left out to incentivize states to create their own exchanges. If the USSC strikes down the federal subsidies blame this guy, not the court.
[Attention John Roberts! No need to worry. Even the DUmmies will blame Gruber for the decision.] Same sort of crap is going on with TPP most transparent my ass
[TPP stands for Trans-Pacific Partnership. I at first thought it might mean Toilet Paper Products and have something to do with the lack of it in SOCIALIST Venezuela.] Yup. And it worked. Most people still have no idea what ACA is about.
[You have to pass the bill to find out what's in it.] Progressives, what are we to make of this? What do you guys think of this admission by Gruber? Does it taint ACA or do we plow on despite this admission. I don't have to tell you, the right-wingers are all over this as "evidence" of ACA's illegitimacy.
[I'm calling LOUSY FREEPER TROLL on that post. Too many "tells" give it away starting with a low post count. I point this out in the spirit of helping out wannabee trolls. A true professional as your humble correspondent has NEVER been caught. BTW, I am not now nor have I ever been DUmmie IndianaGreen.] When ACA was first introduced, I was amazed that people did not see it for the gift to insurance companies that it was.
[I was amazed that the DUmmies at first angrily opposed it but once it was passed into law pretended to embrace Obamacare only because conservatives opposed it.] Unfortunately, unelected wiseguys like Gruber are the actual leaders of the party. It's time to repeat this again...The leaders of the party are not the politicians. The leaders of the party are, in practical fact, the unelected people who the politicians look to for advice. The fight for the soul of the party is between those advisors and the base. The only way to get rid of those "genuses" is to make them look dumb. Which requires that client politicians who follow their advice actually lose.
[So will that mean you will vote against ALL the Democrats who supported ObamaCare in the next election?] Surely this gruber punk can be tried for fraud. At least in the US that once existed before it became ok to tell lies to congress.
[To be consistent, wouldn't Obama also have to be tried for fraud? I quote WILLIAM RIVERS PITT: "F*** you, Mr. President, you piece of sh*t used-car salesman."] The only reason that DU was applauding this piece of crap is because "Obama". Had a Repub tried to introduce the same exact law DU would have been vilifying it all over the place.
[DUmmie TorchTheWitch WINS a Kewpie Doll for having a brief moment of mental clarity!] I despise people like this, but they are running our party. Now, how do we get rid of them?
[By voting conservative Republican but for you that would be an unthinkable option. ] his is a huge, possible game changer for me. If we can't propose and sell good progressive legislation on its merits without succumbing to deception and contempt of the people, then I just don't know what. I am as dispirited now than I can remember ever being, more so than in 2000, 2004 or 2010. I am NOT, decidedly NOT, have NEVER been a subscriber to the philosophy that "the ends justify the means." I hate them all, because it's clear that they hate me and people like me. Face it, we're not citizens anymore, we're subjects.
[More accurately, you're DUmmies. Now on to the other DUmmie thread.....] Obamacare Architect: ‘Lack of Transparency’ Helped Us Pass the Law
[BTW, what is Jonathan Gruber's DUmmie screen name?] Searching for Gruber's name in DU, I found plenty of big threads about him. Do you consider these statements problematic?
[Problematic for ALL those Democrats who voted for ObamaCare] They statements in the video are certainly not helpful and are a little embarrassing.
["Little?" Nice understatement.] 2000 page bill, poorly written, and deliberate lack of transparency by the government we pay for. Yeah, stupid voters.
[Stupid DUmmies but that's redundant.] He didn't lie.
[Correct. Gruber told the truth about deceiving the public so that ObamaCare could pass.] People shouldn't get all hung up over little white lies. The important thing is that if you like your plan you can keep it. And that your healthcare costs will go down by $2500.
[Ah, DUmmie sarcasm at work. But is that a REAL DUmmie?] I'm sure some people benefited from ACA. I don't begrudge them. I'm happy they got the insurance they need.
I just don't know any of those people. Every one I know will be penalized on their taxes and still have to depend on the county hospital. Which by the way, raised my tax bill this year. I have to pick one day a week to fast as it is. Hey, maybe that keeps me healthy. Yay.
[Soon you will have to pick one day a week to eat.] If the Democrats do it, it's a good thing. But if Republicans do it, it's a bad thing.
No wonder punk pieces of filth like this gruber character treat people like 4 year olds.
[I thought he treated people like DUmmies.] Yet complain about Obamacare here and you get pilloried.
[WILLIAM RIVERS PITT is still licking his wounds.]
Please, Blue Fairy! Oh PRETTY PLEASE!!! Please return the Senate to the Democrats in 2016.
The DUmmies are now praying for the Senate to return to majority Democrat in 2016. However, the very map they have posted shows it is an almost impossible task. I see at most 3 or maybe even 4 chances at the most. Not enough to regain the Senate especially since Landrieu looks like history and Manchin has a good chance of switching sides soon. In fact, the Democrats could even lose a couple of seats in 2016. I am thinking of Nevada tossing out Harry Reid and Colorado dumping their remaining Democrat. Even some DUmmies have given up hope as you can see on their thread, The Senate Map Flips in 2016. So let us now watch the DUmmies cross their fingers and wish real hard for a 2016 Senate flip in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, who enjoys watching the DUmmies flip their lids, is in the [brackets]:
The Senate Map Flips in 2016
[Say it enough times and you might believe it.] “After securing control of the Senate Tuesday, Republicans are already staring down a daunting map for 2016,” Roll Call reports.
[It doesn't look daunting at all. Conservatives states are going to vote their approval of shamnesty?] “The majority of the Senate battleground in the next election cycle will be fought on Republican turf, with the GOP defending 24 seats to the Democrats’ 10. There is more trouble for the party beneath those raw numbers; only two Democratic seats are in competitive states, while more than half a dozen Republican incumbents face re-election in states President Barack Obama carried at least once.”
[Yawn! Maybe if you DUmmies rub that map enough and chant it might work. Now to the DUmmie hopeful reactions...] Don't worry
Our wonderful Democratic Party leaders and their highly paid grifters...err...I mean "consultants" and "strategists" will find some way to f*** it up.
[COAKLEY 2016!!!] Yes, but at the moment none of these are "open" seats. I think people don't understand how bad the map was for Senate Democrats this year. Not only were we fighting on Republican turf in many places, but there were so many open seats, due mostly to senators retiring. Right now, there are no open races in any of the states that we would hope to turn from red to blue in 2016.
[Party Pooper!!!] Can Barack Obama Run For Senator In Illinois In 2016?..... I know he says this is his last job - but isn't it possible for him to go back to the Senate? If he can't or doesn't want to - how about Michelle.
[And you call yourselves a REALITY based community?] I wouldn't count on a flip in PA. It's not out of the question, but there has to be a ton of negatives for the Republicans to be ousted in this state.
[Okay, enough with 2016. How about if we talk 2018?]
I am a 30,000 year old reincarnated being who materializes once every 5000 years in a Las Vegas hotel suite. My greatest goal in my eternal life is to spend 6 months on a small tropical island with Mary Matalin doing nothing but pitching a DUmmie FUnnies book (with CD-ROM insert) deal with her. If you happen to be Mary Matalin, please contact me at:
email@example.com. If you are anybody else, you can contact me there too. Remember, if you are a book publisher, please feel free to embarrass me with an extravagant book advance.